Pratik S
Model and activist Emily Ratajkowski has sparked controversy after publicly criticizing Blue Origin’s latest space mission, which featured an all-female crew including Katy Perry, Gayle King, Lauren Sánchez, and Amanda Nguyen.
While the mission was marketed as a historic moment for women in space, Ratajkowski took to social media to express her frustration, calling the trip “beyond parody” and questioning its environmental impact.
Her comments have ignited a heated debate about space tourism, corporate responsibility, and the ethics of billion-dollar space ventures.
Emily Ratajkowski’s Criticism: “You Say You Care About Earth, Then Fly in a Planet-Killing Rocket?”
On April 14, 2025, Ratajkowski posted a TikTok video in which she slammed the Blue Origin mission, questioning the resources used for the brief spaceflight.
“That you care about Mother Earth, and it’s about Mother Earth, and you’re going up in a spaceship that is built and paid for by a company that’s single-handedly destroying the planet?” she said.
She further criticized the marketing behind the mission, asking, “For what? What was the purpose?” and calling the trip “disgusting”.
Her comments have resonated with many environmental activists who argue that space tourism contributes to carbon emissions and resource depletion.
Celebrity Reactions: Who Else Criticized the Mission?
Ratajkowski is not alone in her criticism. Several celebrities have also voiced concerns about the environmental impact and optics of the mission:
- Olivia Wilde mocked Katy Perry’s dramatic return to Earth, sharing a meme of Perry kissing the ground and captioning it: “Getting off a commercial flight in 2025 #BlueOrigin”.
- Amy Schumer sarcastically joked about being added to the flight last minute, highlighting the privilege tied to space tourism.
- Olivia Munn called the mission “gluttonous”, questioning its real-world benefits.
Despite the backlash, Gayle King defended the mission, stating, “I’m not going to let you steal our joy”.
The Environmental Debate: Is Space Tourism Sustainable?
Ratajkowski’s criticism has reignited discussions about the environmental cost of space travel.
1. Carbon Emissions and Resource Use
Space tourism requires massive amounts of fuel, contributing to carbon emissions. Critics argue that billion-dollar space ventures should prioritize sustainability rather than luxury experiences.
2. Corporate Responsibility
Blue Origin, founded by Jeff Bezos, has faced scrutiny for its environmental footprint. While the company promotes space travel as “for the benefit of Earth”, critics argue that its business practices contradict this message.
3. The Ethics of Billionaire Space Missions
Many believe that space exploration should focus on scientific advancements, rather than celebrity joyrides. Ratajkowski’s comments reflect a growing sentiment that billionaire-funded space tourism is out of touch with global issues.
Blue Origin’s Response and Future of Space Travel
Blue Origin has not directly responded to Ratajkowski’s criticism, but the company continues to promote its vision for commercial space travel.
Despite the backlash, space tourism is expected to expand in the coming years, with companies like SpaceX and Virgin Galactic competing for dominance in the industry.
The debate over environmental responsibility vs. technological progress will likely continue as more celebrities and billionaires venture into space.
A Divisive Conversation on Space Tourism
Emily Ratajkowski’s comments have sparked a larger conversation about the ethics and environmental impact of space tourism.
While some view the all-female Blue Origin mission as a symbol of progress, others see it as an extravagant display of wealth that contradicts environmental concerns.
As space travel becomes more accessible, the question remains: Should billion-dollar space missions prioritize sustainability over spectacle?
Read More Stories: Follow CelebStoriess!
Leave feedback about this